Channel Seven fails to stop Aboriginal group’s Sunrise defamation lawsuit

Blurred footage of Indigenous Australians was shown while white commentators talked about removing Aboriginal children from their families.

Protesters rally outside Channel 7 studios Sydney to protest against Channel 7 breakfast show "Sunrise" Aboriginal adoption segment.

Protesters rally outside Channel 7 studios Sydney to protest against Channel 7 breakfast show "Sunrise" Aboriginal adoption segment. Source: Crowdspark

Lawyers representing an Indigenous group who are suing Channel Seven feel confident after the TV network failed to stop the lawsuit going ahead.

Yolngu woman Kathy Mununggurr and 14 others from the remote Northern Territory community of Yirrkala are suing Channel Seven for defamation over a controversial breakfast show segment.

The lawsuit alleges that the Sunrise program defamed the applicants by playing slightly blurred background footage of them during a controversial panel discussion which aired in March 2018.

TV presenter Samantha Armytage introduced the 'Hot Topics' segment by incorrectly stating that Aboriginal children at “risk of rape, assault and neglect” could not be adopted by white families.

Conservative commentator Prue MacSween suggested they should be taken from their families "just like the first Stolen Generation" and broadcaster Ben Davis agreed.

The segment led to and during an episode filmed on the Gold Coast. The offensive comments were found to be in .
Sunrise, 13 March 2018. Prue MacSween and Ben Davis brought on as panelists to discuss adoption of Aboriginal children.
Prue MacSween, Samantha Armytage and Ben Davis appear on the Sunrise program on March 13. Source: Twitter / Sunrise
The background footage was originally filmed with consent for a health promotion in Yirrkala – a small Aboriginal community approximately 700km east of Darwin.

The Yolngu group claims that by using the footage for a segment about child abuse, Sunrise implied that they had abused, assaulted or neglected children.

They also claim Seven breached their confidence and privacy by using the footage for a different purpose than intended, and breached consumer laws by acting unconscionably.

The TV network tried and failed to strike out the lawsuit at a Federal Court hearing in Sydney on Wednesday.

Seven’s barrister Kieran Smark, SC, argued there were issues with claiming those in the footage could be identified.

Justice Steven Rares disagreed, and said Indigenous communities in remote parts of Australia, particularly the Northern Territory, were "much more integrated than the suburbs of this country".

"You've got a whole community up there, most of whom will be able to recognise each other, some of whom watch Sunrise," he said.

The judge rejected the request to strike out the claim and ordered Seven to pay the costs of the hearing.

Lawyers for the Yolgnu group described the hearing as a “victory” ahead of an anticipated trial later this year.

“There are many rounds yet to go but we are feeling confident that we’ve got a strong claim,” said Peter O’Brien, principal solicitor of O’Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors.

Share
3 min read
Published 13 June 2019 5:45pm
By NITV Staff Writer
Source: NITV News


Share this with family and friends